Macleod　還沒有搞明白 .8g)av+  
TFC更不知道怎么用？？？？？？？

設計還是要積累經驗和看書的樓上那位xd

請問，有誰知道latio3得密度？謝謝

肯定用誰的說誰好用，你又沒有去買兩個軟件用，是吧。。。

TFc不錯

macleod 操作方便,界面比較好

沒有軟體啊,郁悶!

Macleod第一；ＴＦＣ第二！！！！

有個網民如是說,其經驗比較完整,供大家參考: %> eiAB_b  
{
\5
  
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 q9_OGd|P  
o.!Dq7R  
Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax. 2ilQXy  
FZlWsp=  
I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now. O>,e~#!  
pnOAs&QAm  
The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software eauF~md,  
available, but more difficult to use.

Macleod好貴的 自己是買不起的 fHFE){  
我學校又不買 !Vk^TFt`  
TFC倒是有的買 7[)E>XRE  
而且學起來不難